Skip to main content

The Minoltas 5xi and 7xi

Pretty little things...
The xi series was Minolta's nemesis. The 7xi was greeted as a technological marvel, it's announcement was written on newspapers of that time as it introduced "fuzzy logic" - a 90's way of refering to artificial intelligence. Minolta spend millions of dollars for the development of the camera with part of its technology being used in the rest of the xi cameras. And yet, those cameras did not bring in the revenue Minolta expected. The xi series was deemed as full of unnecessary features, overcomplicated, with high battery consumption and no extensive line of exotic lenses. This was a blow for Minolta that saw their sales plummeting behind Canon and Nikon.

 
The Minolta 7xi
The Minolta 7xi
As already said, the Minolta 7xi was hailed as a technological marvel back in 1991 with technology still used in modern Sony digital cameras. The 16bit RISK chip set integrated focusing and metering. It was able to distinguish between 3 different types of scenes (portrait, landscape and macro) and would adjust the light meter zones accordingly. The 7xi metering system consists of 14 zones which all contribute to the exposure but in a variable percentage. The 7xi was able to automatically identify the main subject and shift the percentage that the zones would contribute to the exposure - this makes the camera very efficient with calculating exposure.

AF speed is also well improved compared to the previous line, Minolta claims that the 7xi is able to track a car moving towards the camera at the speed of 60mph. Although the 7xi was not the first camera that could identify subject movement and switch to Continuous AF, it was the first that would switch from one AF sensor to another to keep tracking the subject (a technique that was elevated to a state of art in the Nikon F5). According to Popular Photography, the same AF and light meter module was used on the later 9xi and 700si cameras although in the latter one's newer electronics made it slightly more responsive.

It will take ages to go through all the functions of this camera, the manual is 106 pages long plus a quick reference guide. Instead I will just limit my review on how it feels using this camera.
The three amigos..
The design of the camera is interesting - quite long and thick but not very tall, this is a handsome camera but it's design makes it feel bigger than it really is. Actually, the Nikon F90x is about the same size but feels smaller. Canon EOS 5 is bigger but more comfortable to hold. The 7xi is more streamlined and looks good with a few buttons here and there. The 7xi is the first Minolta to ditch the push-pull buttons, strangely enough, the newer 5xi still has them. In the 7xi they were replaced by two more ergonomic rotation wheels. 

But how is it taking pictures with it? Well, if you manage to disengage the eye-start feature which consumes a lot of battery (read on how) and disable the auto-zooming of the 'expert program'(check manual) it is a quite good camera actually. I have to say that the AF is very good and responsive even by today's standards. With the cheap 28-80 f/4-5.6 the cameras ability to lock focus is excellent, I can see why it caused such a sensation back in 1991. Metering is first rate and user interface is something you can get used to if you try really hard. Viewfinder is not the biggest or brightest but is good enough, the mirror box is silent enough (and so is the motordrive) and has plenty of useful features (and many more that are useless). Using the camera delivered good pictures but brought up memories of the biggest sibling (the 9xi), mainly the fact that simplicity in camera design when it comes to buttons should go hand-in-hand with its features onboard. Cameras of similar vintage (i.e. EOS 5) are so much easier to use.
The Minolta 7xi can easily track my daughter running and jumping
Ok, all these might make the 7xi sound like a bad camera. It isn't, it is quite good even by today's standards but it is quirky and very often it has a mind of it's own - if you don't disable the auto-size zoom you find the camera suddenly zooming in when you least expect it (or want it). It always takes you by surprise - it is something that you don't want a camera to do. The biggest problem with this camera is not the amount of features it has but the inability to disengage them. The newer 700si is a better camera just for that reason - it offers you the choice not to use them. Still, with all its quirks, the Minolta 7xi is an excellent camera.


 The Minolta 5xi
The Minolta 5xi
A few months after the launch of the 7xi, Minolta identified a gap in their camera line. The older 5000i sold very well but it was technologically obsolete by that point. The newer 3xi received raving reviews and the 7xi was a big step ahead. Minolta thought that there is a market for a in-between 5xi model, more advanced than the 3xi but less feature loaded than the 7xi.

That didn't work. Casual family snappers went for the 3xi and enthusiastic amateurs headed for the 7xi. The 5xi did not sell well as price was significantly higher than the 3xi and very close to the 7xi.

The 5xi is a competent camera thought. There is a single AF point that is quite efficient, eye-start feature, a simplified 8 zone metering system, single frame advance, pull-push buttons instead of rotation wheels, Focus priority only, DX film only, spot metering and shutter speed up to 1/2000 only. 

With these specifications, the 5xi is a simple camera to use. Only real disadvantage for me is the DX film only. That *can be* a problem some times - there is an exposure compensation of 1/2 stop but with some films I prefer the 1/3 stops compensation over the 1/2. Also, while the AF is good, the camera will not take a picture unless focus has been reached - and sometimes it takes time for the camera to lock focus, especially if the subject is moving.
Exposure is spot on
The LCD is unusable
 Other than that, I liked the simplicity of it, the form of the camera is nice and comfortable to hold. It is a very nice and competent camera, exposure-wise it can cope with a wide range of difficult situations and always delivered the goods. The spot button is very handy to use too. For what it's worth, I think the 5xi is a better camera than its contemporary rivals like the F601 or the EOS 1000(F) or EOS 500 series. A thing to watch out for - the LCD in the viewfinder bleeds a lot. In my sample it is difficult to read. Strange stuff, the bigger 7xi doesn't suffer from it (different suppliers?).


The P(anic) button and a couple of tricks
This is a typical Minolta thing, a button dedicated to reset the camera every time you have messed up the settings. Although it sounds like a good idea, it is badly executed. If you accidentally press the button it will reset the things you don't want to reset, namely exposure compensation (in DX only cameras), Auto-flash and Auto-size zoom. Nikon's approach is much better, a combination of buttons reset the camera.
Also, there is a way to disengage the 'eye-start' feature. Just put a bit of electrical tape over the hand grip sensors. It works really well. Also, if the grip starts becoming white and brittle, put a bit of furniture polish, the one without silicone. It's been more than 6 months now and it still looks like new.


Conclusion
These two Minolta's come from a period when technology became cheap and easy to implement. That pushed the camera manufacturers to invent the next big thing - these cameras feel like the scientific calculators of the early 90's - loads of functions, loads of buttons, loads of frustration to get your head around them. The Minoltas are good cameras that will do the job they meant to do but there are plenty of other cameras that will do the same and are easier to use. Don't go out of your way to find and buy one, get a newer model instead like the 700si. If one finds its way to you cheap, get it. You might find out that you actually like them. At least I do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...