Skip to main content

Rollei XF 35

Cute little thing!
This is a review of the Rollei XF 35, a camera that i bought in a carboot sale and stayed with me for a few weeks before deciding to pass it on.

The Rollei XF35 came out in the now distant 1974. It followed an increasing trend of fully automated cameras like the Olympus 35DC (reviewed in my blog), the Minolta H-matic or the Petri Computor II just to name a few with fast lenses and compact dimensions. The Rollei XF 35 was an affordable camera made to supplement the already very popular 35-series. In the early 1980's it cost around $60 almost half the price of the more prestigious siblings.

One thing that you notice when you pick up this camera is its light weight and small dimensions. It is smaller than the Olympus 35 DC and lighter. Main selling point for this camera is the lens, it is a Sonnar design, 5 elements in 4 groups and multicoated, a lens of honorable background and well regarded in the photographic industry. I shot half a roll of film for testing purposes with this camera and I was impressed with the quality of the lens.
The Olympus is a bit bigger but significantly heavier.
The camera offers auto-exposure and Bulb mode, both selected by a small switch on the bottom of the lens mount. This is a camera for good light conditions, shutter speed goes down to 1/30 sec for f2.3 - roughly the equivalent of the light in a church or museum with a 400ISO film (I did it that's why i know) which is good enough for me or street work. The lightmeter is good, it originally used the outlawed PX625 mercury cell but i used the readily available LR9 which gives a bit higher voltage but the exposures were good, no issue with that.

On the door and inside, plastic seems to be less reflective
A couple of things that i didn't like: The film rewind button protrudes way too much. Also only up to 400 ISO film which i find it limiting. No exposure compensation although i suppose you can use the ASA dial for that.
The A/B switch on the bottom
This camera seems to attract a lot of negative criticism on the internet regarding its plastic construction. Well, sure, it is not a Leica but neither is the Olympus Mju-II (Epic) or the Yashica T4 and they cost twice the money. Another issue is that the rangefinder of these cameras seem to be getting out of alignment - in my sample the horizontal alignment is fine but the vertical seems to be tiny bit off - in any way it does not affect focusing accuracy.
The XF35 is a small camera
When it came to pictures, the camera delivered the goods. Light meter is accurate and the lens is excellent. I believe that this lens is performing better than the Mju-II (epic) lens in terms of sharpness although that will be difficult to prove. Overall i was very happy with the performance of the camera with back light, as expected the contrast ended up being low but still the results are more than acceptable.
Despite the sun being inside the frame, the lens did very well (click for bigger)
The camera gave nice results even wide open - this is a picture taken in the local museum. smooth out of focus and plenty details on the girl on the foreground.
The lens is excellent performer (click for bigger)
Conclusion
This is a camera that has received a lot of negative criticism on the internet due to it's plastic construction but when it comes to delivering a picture, the lens is fantastic. I easily place this lens among the best i have used on P&S cameras. Prices on the internet remain low, if your sample is in good condition and you don't have the tendencies to throw cameras on the floor, you will be very pleased with the results.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...
2 comments
Read more

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more