Skip to main content

Olympus OM-10

This is a review of the Olympus OM-10. The camera came to me via a colleague at work – it belonged to her father in law and was kindly passed on to me once she found out that I use old film cameras.

The Olympus OM-10 has been one of Olympus' most commercially successful models and that is because it was based on a very successful recipe – the OM-10 is a (feature) stripped down OM-2n, a very popular professional model reviewed in this blog. It maintained the small size and compatibility with the Zuiko system, stuck with the aperture priority mode which was so very popular in the early eighties and offered the optional 'Manual Adaptor' that could offer full manual operation. And most importantly, it uses the highly regarded OTF plane metering system of the OM-2n. These features made the OM-10 a very attractive offer, especially if you think that it was competitively priced – Olympus sold these cameras by millions.

Top plate is clean and simple
The size of the camera feels very similar to the OM-2n, but the OM-10 has a slightly raised pentaprism which makes it look (and feel) a bit bigger than the OM-2n. So what does the OM-10 lose when compared to the OM-2n. Quite a few things – you decide if they are important. First of all, the air-bumpers for the mirror are gone, the OM-10 produces much more noise and vibrations. The top plate is made of plastic – not metal as the OM-2n. ISO range is also a bit more limited. The OM-10 has a bit smaller viewfinder coverage – also the OM-2n has a detachable flash hot-shoe. I am not able to say what other changes are made within the camera but these are the differences I managed to spot in terms of specifications. The OM-10 improves the wind-on stroke which feels smaller and more smooth.

Using the OM-10 is easy and straight forward. Switch it on and rotate the switch on the right either on AUTO (aperture priority) or manual in order to set the speeds via the manual adapter. This is one point of criticism. The indication on the dial is very small and easy to miss – you have to pay
attention and make sure that it is is not in manual because there is no indication in the viewfinder as to what mode you are using. In the viewfinder you have the indicated shutter speed – in Auto is the speed used, in 'Manual' it is the suggested speed.

The optional Manual Adapter
One good thing about the OM-10 is that the camera is always ready to take a picture. If set in Auto, it will take the picture even if you haven't switched it to the 'ON' position. Viewfinder is beautiful, big and bright – the OM-10 uses the same pentaprism as its bigger sibling, the OM-2n. Actually, pentaprisms from OM-10 are used to replace the damaged ones from OM-2n.

Time has been good with this camera, the majority of OM-10s out there work well with no major issues. Keep in mind that this is an electronic camera, when the battery is depleted, you very often get a mirror locked in the up position – don't force it to wind it up, just put new batteries in.


Conclusion
You cannot go wrong with buying this camera. There are so many out there which means that they are plenty cheap and you have access to the Zuiko lens line which are beautifully made and cheap. The OM-10 came with the Zuiko 50 f/.18 “Made in Japan” version which is an excellent lens. With the manual adaptor, you basically get 80% of a OM-2n for 1/3 of the price – which is excellent value for money if you ask me. The metering system is first rate and the Zuiko lenses are something to be experienced. With these cameras fetching as little as £15, I cannot see any reason why someone shouldn't have one.
They are small, reliable, with access to a beautiful lens line, it is a winner for me.

Comments

  1. Unknown24 September 2019 at 14:08

    I have an Om10 and 4 Zuiko and 2 Tamrons and love the photos and the ease of use, brilliant for what is now 40 years old.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ronsurf20 December 2019 at 06:37

    The best thing about OM10s is that they offer access to all the great OM lenses for a very minimal cost. They are not really related to an OM2, though. They are a very different design and are more similar to the OM20, OM30 and OM40. Very easy to bring back into spec if (when) the speeds go awry. I'd recommend getting one of these that has been serviced, or factor the cost of a service into the purchase price. Great value for money cameras, definitely in a higher league than a Zenit, Praktica or dare I say it, an ME-Super.

    ReplyDelete
  3. jojonas31 May 2020 at 14:46

    I had mine for a good while along with the 1, 2 and 4. I haven't used it but poped some batteries in today and to my joy I saw that it was not match needle but a red lamp showing the shutterspeed in the camera! Now I need to tale this lil thing out for a ride :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...
2 comments
Read more

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more