Skip to main content

Minolta X-300

The story will sound familiar as it has been reported time after time on this blog but it applies to this camera too. I spent a considerate amount of time, back in the very early 90's trying to buy, what I thought, my dream camera that I could afford and there were many cameras that temporarily fitted this role before I ended up buying that Practika BMS. The Minolta X-300 and its “S” variant was one of them – broken-hearted after I realised I could not afford it (second hand market was not that big back on those days in Greece) I settled down with the Practika. I few months ago, I found this X-300 in a charity shop for lunch money so I went ahead and bought it for old time's shake.

Minolta was always making beautiful cameras, even the budget models like this one, are well made and with good fit and finish. The plastic top cover could easily pass for metal and despite being the X-700's small brother, it has everything you need: Manual and aperture priority and even AE lock button – Very useful. Shutter speeds are the sort of typical 80's range, 1-1/1000 plus B. Viewfinder is pretty decent, bright and gives quite good magnification. What I liked especially about this camera, is the fact that noise levels and vibrations are kept to minimum.

The X-300 uses the Minolta SR mount, which means that loads of excellent quality optics can be used. This camera came with the MD 50 f/1.7, a lens no stranger to me. Seriously, this lens represent
excellent value for money when you compare it to the Nikon/Canon equivalents.
Pictures from the test roll came out well exposed – no complains about this camera's performance.

Conclusion
I suppose the aim of this small post it to make a point that this is a very good camera to own and use. I see plenty going around and I haven't come across any ones that do not work well. Sure, these cameras were not owned by professionals but still they are very reliable units – possible more reliable than their bigger brother -the X700- that suffers the dead capacitor syndrome.
The problem is that this camera will struggle for attention on the used market. There are other models out there that hold the limelight and the X-300 has to compete with them. As it is now, the X-300 will survive mainly due to its low price and decent set of features that can offer. Usually it comes together with some quality Minolta lens that makes the offer even more tempting. Grab it when you can.


Lasting impressions 

Fast forward 10 years from this review and the X-300 is my main go-to Minolta together with the mechanical SRT-303. One thing not mentioned in the review, is the capacitor issue which is very common but fortunately very easy to solve. 

Once my X-300 started playing up, I ordered a new capacitor online and replaced it. Interestingly, this did not resolve the problem. Puzzled by this odd behaviour, I took it to the internet, only to discover that corrosion on the battery cap threads can actually cause the same issues.

I ended up thoroughly cleaning the metal cap in warm vinegar (left it in the overnight) and cleaned the threads on the bottom base. The camera sprung back to life and never gave me a headache since.

Personally, I would recommend the X-300 over the X-700 on the basis of being a less problematic model (no issues with the frame counter and only one capacitor needing chance as opposed to two for the X-700) and much cheaper. No doubt though - the X-700 is a very good camera too.

Minolta X-300 and Rokkor MC-ii 58f/1.4


Comments

  1. Hi Thanks a lot for the posts in your blogs. I have just started with photography with determine to master in it. I bought a Canon EOS 300 V recently. Is there any blog or piece u have written about studying the techniques of the camera? Thanks a lot. Would really appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Timesa,

      I have a post for the EOS 300V here:
      http://www.manualslib.com/manual/24811/Canon-Rebel-Ti-300v.html

      If you need the manual, you can find it here, it explains all cameras function in depth:
      http://www.manualslib.com/manual/24811/Canon-Rebel-Ti-300v.html

      Enjoy.
      Pan

      Delete
  2. This one is among my top 3 user cameras, although both my copies have a busted frame counter. It is ergonomically perfect and has everything one needs to take great photographs, the only thing missing is a DOF preview button (present on the X500). The X300 has the brightest viewfinder among all my manual focusing cameras (brighter than my ME Super) and one of the most "sensitive" microprism areas I have come across. It's really great that so many exist out there keeping the prices low!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good info. Have a X-300 since July 1987 (new) and today picked up two X-700's. One slightly used and fully operational, the other one looking almost new and... with a broken capacitor :)...

    ReplyDelete
  4. the capacitors in the 300 and 500 are also likely to fail, luckily there's only one easily got at under the bottom cover. replace it with an equivalent dipped tantalum one and it will last forever

    ReplyDelete
  5. I used to service a lot of these and I used to consider the X-300 a really good camera. Well made and well designed, easy to repair and pretty robust. Surprised these get so little acclaim - they are quality cameras.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...