Skip to main content

The lenses I use Part - II

A long overdue post about some more lenses i used since the original post found here.
I am going to limit the post to the lenses that i currently own and i will not include others that i have owned in the past and sold them. I am basing my scoring on usability, personal preference and - most important- performance for the price. 
 

* Minolta AF 28 f/2.8
I am starting with this lens for an obvious reason. It is by far the best lens of the bunch reviewed here. Excellent flare control and ability to record high detail. Sharp even wide open it is plenty sharp by f/2.8. AF speed on my Minolta 9xi is excellent. It includes a lens hood that is integrated on the lens. I bought this lens for £8 so i am very very happy with it, usually goes for around £80 which i believe it totally deserves it. Some sample pictures here and here. An excellent lens. Score: 9 out of 10
* Tokina 28 f/2.8 SL
Another excellent lens that can be had for peanuts. I paid £5 for it together with the Pentax P30T reviewed on this blog. Very good sharpness and contrast control. Very soft at f/2.8 it gets better a couple of stops later. A nice lens, i would definitely recommend it. A sample here. Score: 7 out of 10
 * Minolta 50 f/1.7
Minolta is well known for producing very good quality optics. Just like it's AF sibling, this is a very nice lens for your Minolta. It is quite soft wide open and it takes a few stops to sharpen up but by f/5.6 is as sharp as any other 50mm lens. My sample has a dented filter ring so i got it very cheap - £6. Price-wise i think that these lenses are on the cheap side for their performance. A very good lens. Score: 6.5 out of 10
* Pentax SMC-50 f/2
The poor relative of the K-series, everyone seem to be after the 50f/1.7 sibling. The build quality of this lens is by far the best of all the lenses reviewed on this post. Picture quality is quite good although people who own this lens and the f/1.7 say that the f/1.7 is much better. I don't know. Soft wide open but it gets sharp once stopped down. A good lens. Score 6 out of 10





*Ricoh Rikenon 50 f/2
This is a very pleasant surprise. I have a very good experience of shooting with rikenon lenses and this little gem did not let me down. This is the single coated version of the more sought after XR f1.7 version who many proclaim to be one of the sharpest lenses ever produced (although test shoots do not seem to totally agree with that). My sample is beautifully sharp even wide open with very good flare control. The dimentions of this lens are very small, it is almost a pancake lens and build quality is good but it does not reach the levels of the Pentax SMC-50 f/2. A sample picture with the lens at (f/11) here. An excellent lens that can be found dead cheap. Score 8 out of 10
 * Yashica 50 f/1.9 DSB
A good Yashica lens that performs well but it is nothing to be excited about. I have come across two samples so far, both suffering from sticky aperture blades. Please read my review on the Yashica FR for more information. Score: 5 out of 10
 * Topcon AM 55 f/1.7
By far the worst lens of the bunch, this lens even challenges the motto of "all 50mm lenses being good lenses". This lens never managed to produce any sharp pictures and wide open it is soooo soft. To be fair, my sample has a rear screw missing so i am wondering if someone has been in there before. Based on the performance of my sample i would recommend that you avoid this lens. Score: 2 out of 10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...