Skip to main content

Fuji Zoom Date 1000

I actually bought this camera accidentally - I saw it and I thought it was the Fuji Silvi which is more sought after camera and have the same user interface. I bought it for £1 and when I returned home I realised my mistake. Ohh.. what the heck, it is just a pound so it stayed in the cupboard for some time, thinking most of the time to sell it. Eventually I forgot all about it and a month ago, as I was tidying up the closet I found it again. I thought to run a film through it and see how it performs.
Fuji's User interface. Big and easy to follow
The little Fuji comes from the distant 2002 and it was marketed as an upper class hi-end compact. It had a street price of £200 when new and Popular Photography reviewed it along with cameras such as the Minolta TC-1, the Contax T3 etc and gave it a 3.5 out of five. No bad at all actually. According to the magazine the lens performed very well to excellent with very low flare due to Fuji's EBC coating.  The pictures I got from this camera came out quite good actually, good contrast and very little -if nay - flare but not up to the same league as the fixed lens compacts I have reviewed in my blog. Better to use this compact between the 28mm and somewhere in the middle (around 50mm) - beyond that you can notice a drop in the quality. The lens is slow also, f5.6 at 28mm and reaching (I think) f/11 at 100mm - so it is not for low light photography. 

Fuji Zoom date 1000 vs. Olympus Super zoom 140s vs. Rollei Giro 70wa
 
But how does the Fuji compare with the other two -similarly feature packed - compact offerings from Olympus and Rollei? Actually, there is little to choose between them. All three cameras produce pretty much the same results so it is down to personal preference. The Fuji is smaller that the other two and has a nice aluminium body while the other two feel quite plastically. The Olympus focuses the fastest of the three and has a spot meter but it is at the same time the biggest of them all. My Rollei sample has been a bit temperamental, at times refusing to focus but I do have nice pictures from it and the lens has the best looking coating I've ever seen ! Out of the three, the Olympus is the quietest and the loudest is the Rollei which sounds like a blender each time it advances the film. 
Beautifully Coated lens !
Fuji vs. Olympus size
 
Conclusion
The Fuji Zoom date 1000 is a nice camera that can be found quite cheap on car boot sales. It produces nice results and it has an attractive aluminium finish. Don't pay more for a tenner to get it. There are other cameras flooding car boot sales that produce pretty similar results and cost less. If you decide to go ahead with buying it, stick to the wider end of the zoom range and you will be pleasantly surprised.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...
2 comments
Read more

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more