Skip to main content

Yashica MG-1

I got this camera for a pound. The owner said that she had never used it and i do believe her as this camera seems to be in brand new condition. I have a soft spot in my heart for Yashica rangefinders, my father's camera was a Yashica Minimatic-C which he used to record his life in Australia in the '60s. That camera became my very first toy and therefore my bias towards those cameras. But, what's not to like with these cameras? The fit and finish is excellent and their lenses are beyond any criticism. The MG-1 was marketed as not a professional model, they lacked a parallax correction and a fast lens, but still this model is so well made that you wish your digital slr was so well-made.
Yashica's Electro series is quite straightforward to use. You set the aperture and the camera selects the speed. If with the selected aperture, there is the risk of overexposure, then a red light will light on - if there you are underexposuring then an orange will light on. Not much to say about it really. The shutter is dead-silent, as is always the case with leaf shutters. The camera uses the long discontinued PX32 mercury battery. You can use a PX28A alkaline battery with a little spring as the contemporary batteries are smaller in size.
With all the hype going on about the GSN series, the MG-1 assumed the role of the "poor relative" of the line which is not true. The pictures I got from this camera are very good, the lens performs as well as my Industar-61 i have for my FED and the light meter appears to be accurate, even for a above-the-lens element.



 Conclusion

This is a very good camera. Well made, with a good lens and an accurate light meter. There is no reason to pay the premium for a GSN model, unless you really need the f/1.7. I recomment this camera to anyone who starts with rangefinder cameras and wants to try them out without breaking the bank. As for me, I will soon sell this camera. The only problem is that I have already a Leica and the FED-3, both collectible items and with the FED having the advantage of accepting a series of f/2 lenses. There is nothing wrong with this camera, it's just that i am trying to keep only a few cameras, so I will let the MG-1 go. If you are after a fixed-lens rangefinder, give the Yashica a really good consideration.

Comments

  1. Nedhal Nooh9 September 2012 at 08:19

    hi there,

    i was looking for a picture of yashica mg-1 and here i found it.

    can i use it on my personal page?

    regards,
    nedhal

    ReplyDelete
  2. Panagiotis Giannakis9 September 2012 at 12:34

    Sure, go ahaead.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon N90s (F90x)

This is a review of the Nikon N90s which is the same as the Nikon F90X in Europe. I came across this camera while I was browsing on that big auction site for a Nikon lens for the F4s. An online retailer was selling it for £23 including postage so I thought it would be silly to ignore it. The camera is in mint condition except from a small depression on the prism that has created a scratch. Everything else is shining new! Without going into too much details about the history of this model, the early 90's where still quite difficult for the AF Nikons as they where not the fastest systems around although they were offering backward compatibility with older lenses. In 1992, Nikon released the plain F90 which was an improvement over the older F-801s but still it wasn't a match for the Canons or Minoltas of that era. The F90x came in 1995 and placed Nikon back on the AF SLR map. It was the first Nikon with an AF module which was just as good - and at times better ...
2 comments
Read more

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more