Skip to main content

Rollei 35 SE

The Mighty 35SE
This is a review of the Rollei 35SE - a camera that was generously donated to me back in December.

There are very few cameras that I can think of that attract the controversy that the Rollei 35 does. All these for a good reason, it is quirky, it is finely made and it is a viewfinder camera, meaning that you have to guess the distance. And this is usually where everything goes wrong.

There is no shortage of information online about these cameras, Wikipedia and 35mmc websites are the places to start if you want to know more about the ins and outs of this camera plus a bucket load of historical information that led to the creation of this camera.But I will limit this review down to the user experience. 
Rumors have it that the Queen ditched the Leica for the Rollei
Once you pick the camera up you notice the small square-ish size of it. With the lens collapsed it easily fits in a jacket pocket. Another thing straight away obvious: the film advance level is on the left of the camera. Other unconventional touches include placing the shutter speeds and aperture dial on the front of the camera and the hot shoe on the bottom. With the hot shoe being in the bottom, you can basically forget using any external viewfinder or range finder - it is just unuseble.
Elegant yes - usable? No.
When it came to subcontractors, Rollei chose the best. Compur produced the custom made shutter that allows to be collapsed and Gossen provided the light meter. No cutting corners there.

Now, my sample is a "Made in Singapore" one and came with a few issues. Speeds below 1/30sec are erratic and it also suffers with the usual problem that Rollei 35 cameras can suffer from. Somewhere along the way, someone tried to collapse the lens without advancing the film, so it seems that something has come out of alignment and does not always trigger the shutter. See pic for more details.
Left: Latched Correctly - Right: It will not trip the shutter
The only way around it is to advance the film and collapse the lens and extend it again - that places the latch at the correct position next to that boomerang-shaped part. This makes an awkward camera more awkward but I am hoping that a service will sort it out.
*NEVER COLLAPSE THE LENS WITHOUT ADVANCING THE FILM*.

The 35 series came with a variety of lenses. My sample has the highly regarded Carl Zeiss Sonnar 40 f/2.8. In my experience (and see the pictures on this post) this lens worths all the hype it receives on the internet.
Plenty sharp by f/5.6 (click for bigger size)
 It is sharp and has a lovely contrast while at the same time renders the image in a vintage sort of way (this is a poetic expression actually, not some sort of exact science that can be accurately described or replicated).
Ilford HP5 Plus in HC110 - Rollei 35SE
Another thing that I found difficult to deal with is the relatively sensitive shutter button. Pressing it to get a light meter reading has resulted in two occasions to trigger the shutter - it takes time to get used to it.

Using this camera is a good fun but not always easy. You need to be well versed to zone focusing and stick to f/5.6 - f/11 to get sharp pictures. Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a light camera and camera shake can be an issue. Stick to speeds above 1/125 sec - a 400iso film is preferable in good weather conditions.
The Rollei 35SE is capable of excellent results
Conclusion
A difficult camera to recommend. They are expensive and difficult to use if you are not used to zone focusing. It is a rare beast that requires a lot more than good intentions in order to get a good picture out of it. Overall, the lens is excellent and the light meter is accurate, it is small and inconspicuous but it demands your dedication and a lot of practice. Maybe start with another viewfinder camera and if it works well maybe pay the extra premium to get one of these. 
It is a real jewel of a camera but not user friendly.

Comments

  1. Had my R35 (Tessar) for 8 years, I barely managed to shoot two rolls of film before sending it off. Great to hold and fondle, terrible in use. On the other hand, I have immensely enjoyed using my R35B with the "inferior" Triotar lens. It is definitely more plasticky, but the controls are much more logically arranged and the selenium meter is easier to use, does not need batteries and us dead-on after all those years (also goes up to 3200!). Image quality- wise, I can not really tell the difference between the two lenses, except maybe against the light the Tessar produced a more pleasant veiling instead of true flare.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...