Skip to main content

Olympus OM-2n

This is a review of the Olympus OM-2n – a camera that I bought locally from a shop that was closing down. It cost me £30 which is usually within the maximum amount of money I am willing to spend on second hand gear but still I consider it to be a bargain of a price for such a wonderful camera.

Before you start reading this review, read my review of the Olympus OM-1n that I have here. For me, the OM-2n is just like an OM-1n with aperture priority exposure mode. If you did like the OM-1, you will like the OM-2n too. Everything that makes the OM-1n a classic camera, is here with the OM-2n too: Excellent build quality, small size, big and bright viewfinder, silent and smooth operations and beautiful lenses – everything there to please you. But there are some differences too.

The OM-2n is an electronic camera, no batteries means no camera. Also the light meter on the OM-2n is very sophisticated, in auto-mode and for the shutter speeds between 1sec to 1/45, it reads
The metering pattern on the first curtain
the light directly from the reflection of the film plane, between 1/45 to 1/1000 it measures it from the printed pattern of the first curtain just before exposure. This does not seem to have any impact on the shutter lad time, it feels the same with it's mechanical sibling. In manual mode the meter works just like the OM-1n. Therefore, the OM-2n uses two separate light sensors – the reading you get on the viewfinder is not necessary the same with the one you will get during exposure.

Once you switch the camera to Manual, the camera feels and works just like the old OM-1n. Problems with deteriorating prism foam, unfortunately apply to this camera too, although my sample is not too bad.

Now, something VERY important. You need to use the SR44 type of battery with this camera. The cheaper LR44 gives inaccurate meter reading that can vary from ½ to 2 stops (some report even 3 stops). The Duracell A76 cell that came with this camera, gave anything from ½ to 1 stop
Control dials are self-explanatory really
over-exposure. When I put a “fresh” LR44 cell bought from a poundshop (30 batteries for a pound), despite being just take out of the pack, it gave 2 stops over-exposure! When I bought a Duracell SR44 battery, all readings agreed with my Nikon F90x readings. It is spot on. So be careful, even if the LR44 cell gives you accurate readings, it will deteriorate as the voltage drops below 1.5v. Cheap batteries cannot even guarantee 1.5v.

Once I sorted out the meter readings, I loaded a film and started shooting away. As expected, I like this camera a lot. It feels so well made and so smooth that you enjoy using it.

As I said earlier on, this is an electronic camera, this means that if you run out of battery while taking a picture, the mirror might stay in the up position. Turning the switch to the “Reset” position, should be enough to reset the mirror, some people recommend doing that with the shutter speed set to “B”. In both cases, this will mechanically trip the shutter and bring the mirror down. If nothing happens, then.... hmm.. the camera probably needs servicing.


Conclusion:
As I said earlier on, if you like the OM-1, you will like the OM-2n too. They are very similar cameras and using them feels the same too. There are not many things that I can go into depth about, after reading my review of the OM-1, the same things (in terms of using the camera) apply to this one too. It is a pure pleasure looking through the viewfinder, it is impossible to understand how a small camera like this has bigger and brighter viewfinder than the massive Canon EOS-1n RS, it is brilliantly made. Keep an eye open for one of these and get them if they are in good working order, some 40 years later these cameras will benefit from servicing them. The black samples like mine tend to fetch more money in the used market but unless you really need a black version, the silver ones are the way to go (difference in price is considerable).
I do like this camera a lot, may I dare to say – and that is because I am a lazy photographer who loves auto-exposure – that I like the OM-2n even better than it's mechanical sibling!
A true classic – Highly recommended


Update (11/6/2016)

After shooting a couple of films more with this camera, it has raised it's status from “fantastic camera” to “super-fantastic camera”. There are a few things worth mentioning though.

First of all, I removed the top cover from the camera and cleaned the nasty foam from there. It was easier that I thought it will be – the foam used is relatively small and you can pick some of it out with a pair of tweezers. There is a video on Youtube on how to remove the foam on the OM-1, pretty much the same applies for the OM-2n.

As I said in the review of the camera, the OM-2n uses two metering modules, the one that controls the needle in the viewfinder and measures light in the viewfinder and the other that is placed on the bottom of the mirror box and controls exposure. These are completely independent meters. But, if you are shooting in manual mode and you use the meter reading provided in the viewfinder, you will notice that the more you move your eye away from the viewfinder, the more the needle shows a faster shutter speed. That is because light comes in from the viewfinder and increases the exposure readings. So make sure you keep your eye close to the viewfinder in order to get an accurate metering.

In a way, the OM-2n half-addresses the lack of speed/aperture readings in the viewfinder. Still there is no aperture reading in there but in Auto mode you do get an indication of a shutter speed used.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...