Skip to main content

Canon EOS 1RS

This camera was not on my plans but I came across this advert on the very popular selling site, it was local to me, so I ended up buying it. I paid only £60 for it, most of it was money gathered from selling other cameras featured on this site.

Any single digit Canon camera is something special and I always kept an eye open for a EOS-1n. The EOS-1n is a fantastic, reliable workhorse that many people still enjoy using. The EOS-1RS is an exotic variant which utilizes a pellicle semi-transparent mirror that does not lift up during exposure. The result is a ½ to 2/3 of a stop reduced exposure as the 1/3 of the light goes towards the viewfinder. The advantages of the pellicle mirror are: a) no blackout during exposure, you can still see through the viewfinder and b) reduced noise, vibration and shutter lag.

Once you pick up the camera, you realise that it is a big camera to hold. It is taller than the Nikon F4s and heavier although the mass distribution is much better. This results in the camera feeling actually lighter than it is and seems to fit better in my hands than the F4s. Fit and finish is superb, as you would be possibly expect from it and there is a degree of water-proofing, meaning it can deal with a bit of rain but do not take it underwater. Top plate is made out of some sort of exotic plastic, I haven't still seen any EOS-1n with a cracked top plate, I have seen plenty with scratched ones but none cracked.

Noise levels are kept low but I cannot say that this is a quite camera. I would definitely expect it to be more quite but as it is, it is in the same category as the Canon EOS-5 or the Nikon F4s but don't expect rangefinder noise levels. Another disappointment comes from the viewfinder. It is a bit darker as expected but it feels so tiny, especially compared with cameras such as the Nikon F90x. Those wearing eye-glasses will struggle to have full view of the viewfinder, pity really, I would love it to have been bigger. As it is, it offers 100% view coverage, as you would probable expect from a camera of this calibre.

The RS mode
In RS mode - standing for Rapid Shooting - the camera shoots on a rate of 10fps and has a shutter lag time of 6ms. See the RS mode as a kind of camera setting, it does not allow much customisation apart from changing the motor-drive speed and a few custom functions. When the camera is set to RS mode, the following steps take place:
  1. When pressing the shutter button half way, the camera will focus and close down the aperture
  2. The shutter will get into a “ready position”
  3. The secondary mirror will fold back
  4. pressing the shutter button any further, a picture will be taken.
Now, although these four steps appear so well defined on paper, in practise they aren't; everything happens so quickly, step 2 will make the shutter produce a sound very similar to the sound of the shutter being activated. It needs a level of familiarization with it. At times I had to look at the frame counter to see if it took a picture or not (of course it had). Practice a bit before you start shooting, on high speed, it can go through a film within 4 seconds, so be careful. As I am writing these lines, I cannot say that I am fully familiar with this shooting mode, I prefer shooting the camera on “A” mode.

Myths and facts around Pellicle Mirrors
Let's see some of the most common statements found on the internet around the use of pellicle mirrors in SLR's
a) Cameras with Pelicle mirrors are not suitable for low light level photography: Not true. Because of the lack of vibrations from the mirror movement, the EOS 1n RS is as good to hold and take a picture as any other camera. On the plus side, because 2/3 of the light goes through the mirror on the AF sensor, this camera is more sensitive to low light levels and does not require AF assist light in order to focus.
b) Pellicle mirror cause flare when shooting against the sun. So does your lens.
c) Pellicle mirrors cause the overall resolution to be lower: That is more of a theoretical problem than it is a practical one. Canon has provided tests online and it actually shows that the difference is negligible, definitely not noticeable.

When switching the camera on “A” mode, it pretty much behaves as an EOS-1n apart from the fact that the mirror does not come up. The camera can be as complex or simple as you want it to be. The four exposure modes and the drive are easily accessible but if you are willing to dive into the different modes and custom functions make sure you have the manual somewhere near. Extra functions are available via the side compartment door – you can tailor this camera to your shooting style and there is a way of resetting everything if you messed up the CF.

A few ergonomic hiccups: First of all, the buttons on the side-door are tiny and difficult to press if you have big fingers. It becomes even more difficult to reset the camera when you have to press two of them at the same time. Also, the main “On-Off” switch is small and fiddly. Finally, if you are an anxious person like me and have the bad habit of chewing your nails, you will find difficult to move the small switch that activates the battery grip buttons for holding the camera vertically. I know I am really picky but ….

Shooting with this camera has been a very pleasant experience. Despite the very good weight distribution, this is a heavy camera and eventually it is becoming a bit tiring to carry it around but it is going to compensate you with its performance. As I said earlier on, allow yourself to get used to the way this camera operates, the shutter button is quite sensitive and rather unforgiving, it is much easier than you think to take a picture when you have the shutter button half-pressed.


Conclusion
A very interesting camera indeed. Unlike other Canon cameras I've used, that you will take them out of the box and start shooting, this camera requires that you spend some time testing it and familiarize yourself with it before loading it an go into that “once-in-a-life-trip-to-the-exotic-destination” to take pictures with. Once you get accustomed to it, it is a tool that know no boundaries. Criticism is easy – yea, I wish it had a bigger and brighter viewfinder and was more silent – but it hasn't. Still it will do its work and do it accurately and reliably.

Best camera I ever had? Possibly – if not, it is definitely up there.
Highly recommended.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...