Minolta Maxxum 9000

Another short review/initial impressions of a camera that unfortunately was not in working order, so I did not put any film in it. This camera was suffering from the dreaded 'Dead aperture magnets' problem, something that marred the first generation of AF cameras from Minolta.

When you pick up the 9000 you immediately understand that this is a very well made camera. Although the outer shell is plastic, there is a lot of metal underneath it and fits well in my hand. It has a rubberised grip which unfortunately it suffers from deteriorating and chipping away but this does not impact on the camera's functionality.

The camera accepts a motor drive but without it you have to manually advance the film after each shot. I find this quite nice really, especially if you like your camera to be quiet – and the 9000 is a quiet camera. The shutter/mirror vibration/noise is kept to a minimum. The camera offers the 4 most important (according to me at least) modes; manual, aperture priority, shutter priority and programme – that is all you need actually. On the light metering department, there is the old-fashioned (but still effective) average metering but it is complemented by spot metering with a highlight/shadow exposure compensation option. An unorthodox depth of field preview lever in right next to the hand-grip, I can't say that I liked that, the old-fashioned button next to the lens mount would have been better.

In terms of AF speed, this is a sloooow module. I feel that it is even slower than the original 7000. There is some info on the internet stating that the 3V battery supply was probably too little for the AF motor. It is slow and it tends to hunt more than the 7000. The viewfinder is nice, bright and clean, although I would prefer the meter reading to stay alight for a bit more time.

Summary

This is a good camera, I see it as the AF version of my beloved X-700. Don't be phased by the slow AF, see it more as an complementary function. The biggest problem with this camera is that sooner or later the magnet that controls the aperture gets broken and renders the camera inoperative. This is the only reason why i cannot recommend buying this camera - sooner or later the dead magnet will catch up with it.

Comments

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface. I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...

The Film Retriever

Search This Blog