Skip to main content

Pentaxt Spotmatic SP

This is a review of the Pentax Spotmatic SP. I base this review on the three months period I spent with this camera and the two test films I shot.

The first Spotmatics reached the store shelves somewhere in 1964 and it was a step ahead from the previous Pentax SLR's, the H3v. The Spotmatics were very well received and gave the M42 mount a real boost. They were well made, quite elegant in appearance and very reliable. The Takumars lenses made for them were, in a word, outstanding. Not only for the build and performance standards of that time but even by today's standards. The Spotmatics placed Pentax firmly in the top 5 camera manufacturers and even with the introduction, almost a decade later, of the K-mount, the first line of the K-series were more Spotmatics than anything else.

This camera has been a charity shop find; people thought that it was broken as it appeared to have been jammed. Always read the manual, it clearly says that when stopping down to take a meter reading ALWAYS REMEMBER to push the switch off otherwise the mirror gets stuck on the up position. And this is what has happened - in this case you push the button down and press the shutter button and everything works well again. So yes, even for a simple camera like the Spotmatic, always read the manual. The camera is in overall good condition for its age and the lens is clear and bright. I'll come back to the lens later on.

Fit and finish is superb and everything has a nice quality feeling to it. The viewfinder is reasonably bright and big, considering that we are talking about a 1960's camera and the shutter button is very responsive. I also like the small window next to the wind on level that turns red when you have winded up the shutter. All well so far. The only annoying thing is the stop-down metering, unfortunately this is a 1960's thing, full open TTL metering came later on. The light meter reacts slowly so give it some time for the needle to settle. Noise and vibration levels are relatively high but they never go to the annoying levels of Prakticas of that period. Of course, time had deteriorated all light seals that had turned into sticky goo, I removed them and i replaced them with self-adhesive felt bought from Hobbycraft. It seems to be working well. Interestingly enough, a lot of resources on the internet state that the Spotmatic SP uses LR44 type batteries. It does NOT. It uses AG10 or equivalent, still 1.5v but it gives accurate exposures. You can get these button cells in every poundshop, I got mine in Poundland. Actually, in terms of accuracy, metering off the wall, the Spotmatic gives identical reading with my Nikon F4s, so it seems that the Spotmatic has a bridged circuit that compensates for the difference in voltage. Much newer cameras (i.e. Olympus OM-1n) don't do that so it is definitely a thumbs up for Pentax!

The camera came with the semi-legendary (or full-legendary to others) Super Takumar 50 f/1.4. This lens is no stranger to me, i have used another copy in the past and it is excellent. This seems to be the newer 7 elements version (the older ones had 8 elements) and it uses Thoriated glass so it is subjected to the usual yellowing but i have found that with black and white film, it works well. If you are into scaring others with
Hm... what is this on the aperture?...
radio-active lenses, this is the one to have. Apparently you can clean the yellowing by placing a UV lamp above the lens and leave it for a day or two. The yellowing will be gone. There seems to be some sort of marks on one of the aperture blades, not sure what this is but it does not affect the functioning of the lens. It can't be oil because it wouldn't have been limited only on one blade but i can't think of what else it might be. Anyway, it doesn't give me any problems so I don't mind. Contrast and sharpness of this lens is excellent and on a par with modern lenses like the Canon EF 50 f/1.8 although the Takumar has its own signature.

Any complaints? Sure, no camera is perfect and neither this one is. First of all, using a camera from the mid-sixties requires time to get familiar with, especially if you are used to newer AF-SLR's that you press
Super Takumar @ 1.4
one button and the camera does it all. With the Spotmatic SP you need to slow down first. Stop down metering is not exactly second nature to me although I did use it a lot with my Zenit. I find it annoying that the camera, in a way locks if you press the shutter button with the stop-down switch on, i might be asking too much but surely it could have been better thought. Another thing that I don't like is the lack of some sort of a lock switch for the shutter button, I attempted to pick the camera from the bag and I accidentally pressed the shutter button and of course I wasted a frame. Having said that, my beloved Olympus OM-1n does not have one either so....

I think, that is where the criticism ends with the Spotmatic. It is very well made and the fact that those cameras keep working after all these decades speaks volumes about the build quality of these amazing photographic machines.


Conclusion
Ok, obviously, the Spotmatic SP is not going to be everyone's cup of tea. I am not planning to keep this camera for the plain reason of having sold all my M42 equipment and i am investing on Olympuses and Nikons. Those who buy it need to keep in mind that they are buying a 1960's camera so expect ergonomics from that era. Who are the potential buyers of these cameras? I would say two different groups. The ones who buy them for the lens, who put the Takumars on digital cameras - I would just say, if you want to see the full potential of the lens, leave it on the Spotmatic, shoot a Kodak Tri-X with it and develop it on HC-110 - No digital sensor will ever give you this beautiful tonality.

The other potential buyer group is the odd-ball M42 lover, who has a collection of lovely lenses and is looking for a reliable M42 body to use them on. And i know that there are loads of good cameras out there that you can use your M42 lenses on, but none is a Spotmatic. Quite simply, the Spotmatic is the M42 benchmark.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...
2 comments
Read more