Skip to main content

Nikon EM

Another car boot sale find, i bought it for the lens actually - i need a Nikon lens for my Nikon F4s so the price of 50 pence sounded right to me and i got the camera with it.
The camera comes from the late 70's (1979 to be exact) and it was aimed at the inexperienced photographer who wanted to know nothing about exposure but just focus, point and shoot (although you had to select the aperture).
The Nikon EM is a diminutive camera, it took Nikon almost a decade to catch up with the trend first started by the Olympus OM-1 back in 1972. With the EM, Nikon presented their E-series lenses, compact in design to complement the EM, FG, FG-20 etc.. The EM is very straight forward camera to use. You turn the selector to B (for Bulb), M90 for a mechanical back up speed and Auto. The camera is compatible with AI lenses (Automatic Indexing) and has it's own dedicated motor-winder called MD-E. 
The first impressions when you pick up this camera are very good. Very compact and quite heavy for it's size, a typical well made Nikon. It is a rather pretty looking camera designed by Giorgetto Giugiaro, the person behind the design of the Nikon F3 and F4. The viewfinder is decent but nowhere near the magnification or clarity of the Pentax MX, or ME. On the left there is the shutter scale and a needle points
The mode selector
towards the speed that the camera automatically selects. The aperture is not visible in the viewfinder. If the selected shutter speed is below 1/30 you get a very annoying "bleeeeep". Extremely annoying, i would be very happy to di-solder the little speaker if i could find it. On the front of the camera there is the exposure compensation button that adds two stops to exposure when needed. Advancing the film is just sensational. So smooth that puts in shame the next better film advance of the Minolta XD-7. 

Size comparison. EM vs ME vs 9xi
But despite the initial good impressions, while using the camera i was left rather cold. First of all, i find the automatic bleeper annoying. Another thing that i did not enjoy is the fact that the mirror is quite loud and not well dumped. Exposure is relatively accurate, certainly good enough for b&w negative films. When i developed the negatives, i noticed that the film transport mechanism was leaving uneven spaces between the frames, resulting in overlaps in certain occasions. Another thing i didn't like was the fact that once you load it with film, the shutter fires in 1/1000 and the light meter engages only when you have reached frame No1. This means that exposures "00" and "0" will not exposure correctly, pity because i can squeeze two extra frames out from my Pentaxes but not from this Nikon.
 
Conclusion
I cannot say that this Nikon managed to impress me. Yes, it is well made and has a massive Nikon system to support it, fair enough. Despite all these, certain ergonomic issues (bleeper, average viewfinder, two frames per film less, inability to override automatic exposure toward underexposure) means that for me, the real deal is the Pentax ME. Not only it is even smaller in size and addresses all the above issues, it also comes in two flavors, simple (a la Nikon EM) and super. Rumors say that the Nikon FG is even better, but until then I'll keep the Pentax....
 

Comments

  1. Anonymous28 August 2015 at 03:37

    I've just bought a Chinon CG-5 on ebay for a few pounds and I'm waiting for it to arrive. I enjoyed your helpful review of the camera. I also have a Nikon EM and have shot quite a lot of film with it. Yes, the beeper is a little irritating, and there's only one manual shutter speed available which is at the M90 setting, but on the whole I've found the shooting experience is positive and very reliable. Also it's remarkably effective automatically metering for exposures from a few seconds to many minutes long if required. If you are into long exposures then the EM teamed up with a good lens is an inexpensive solution. There are usually quite a few examples available online for less than £20 and they nearly all look in surprisingly good condition, which perhaps says a lot about build quality and the materials used.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Panagiotis Giannakis28 August 2015 at 12:14

      Hi,

      I did enjoy the Chinon more than this Nikon to tell you the truth but of course this is very subjective.
      Thanks for stopping by.

      Pan

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...
Post a Comment
Read more

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...
2 comments
Read more