Konica Big-Mini BM-201

A charity shop find that i came across about a month ago. As you probably know, i am not a point and shoot camera fan so it was a buy-to-sell buy in order to further fund my passion for cameras.

This camera comes from the early '90s, and it was targeted at the same lucrative sector of the higher-end point and shoot compact cameras. The big mini resulted in good sales and there are a number of different versions depending on whether they have data-back or not and different aesthetics. All of them share the same very nice lens, a 35 f/3.5 consisting of four elements in four groups. There is also an upper Big-Mini F with a 35 f/2.8 lens but it is not that common and it usually fetches a lot more.

The camera is a bit on the bigger side and the noise that it makes while switching on and taking the picture is probably the biggest disadvantage. Both my EOS 5 and Dynax 9xi are far more quiet than this little monster. Another thing that left me wondering is the shutter button, it wasn't always as responsive as other

Robert Frank with a Big-Mini

P&S cameras. On the positive side, the camera is packed with the usual flash modes and a very useful +- 1.5 stop exposure compensation. Clearly, the biggest advantage of this camera is the very nice lens, the pictures i got from it are very nice overall but to my untrained eye, they seem to lack the contrast of the Yashica T4 or Nikon L35AF.

There are a few reports on the Internet, regarding the rather fragile way the ribbon cable is attached through the back door hinges to the camera. This is something to inspect when buying one of these because apparently there are quite a few that have presented this problem and makes the LCD and the MODE buttons that are situated on the back of the camera, inoperative. And by the way, those little buttons on the back is a real pain to press....

Conclusion

There are some pictures on the Internet with Robert Frank taking a picture with one of those and despite the common knowledge that Robert Frank shot the majority of his well known work with a Leica, not Konica, the Big Mini seems to me to be fetching at this point in time a price tag that i find difficult to justify. I sold mine for £40 which by no means i think is reasonable. I know that i am heavily biased towards SLR's but think what £40 could get you; pretty much any standard 50mm lens will probably outperform the little Konica and the SLRs will offer more versatility. Of course if compactness is your number one priority then sure, why not... otherwise i would suggest you look elsewhere until the prices start dropping to a more reasonable level.

Comments

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface. I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...

The Film Retriever

Search This Blog