Skip to main content

Chinon CG-5

Back in my teen years, I didn't know much about Chinon. The only model I knew was the CP-9AF and my limited knowledge on it was that it was a cheap alternative AF camera to the more prestigious Nikon/Canon/Minolta's. I never really bothered learning about Chinons, what was the point anyway - Nikon and Canons were producing much better cameras, right? Wrong. What i found out after joining photography forums is that almost all Chinons are fantastic cameras, much better than your average SLR's, with certain models competing directly with offers from the big fives (Nikon/Canon/Minolta/Olympus/Pentax) but never really achieved any sort of collectible status. One of these cameras is the Chinon CG-5.
This camera was produced in 1983 and it was set to compete with cameras such as the Minolta X-700, the Canon AE-1 Programme, Pentax ME-Super and P30 and maybe (or maybe not) the Nikons (FE/FE2). In the heart of the CG-5 we find the Seiko MFC shutter which is found in cameras like the Minolta XD-7 or the Pentax ME-super, cameras that have reached a cult status for their reliability and performance. In Minolta terms, i see this camera as a crossover between the XD-7 and the X-700, a high praise indeed, carrying the XD-7's electronic and very reliable shutter in a body made out of aluminium and plastic (like the X-700).
According to Popular Photography, the CG-5 was the scale down version of their professional CE-5, differing only in the fact that the CG-5 does not display the aperture in the viewfinder and the CE-5 having a top speed of 1/2000 (the CG-5 has 1/1000). Both cameras use the same shutter and it seems that in the case of the CG-5, the Japanese went for the German approach to shutters (Leica) to tune down the shutter in order to make it more reliable (The seiko MFC on the Minolta XD-7 is tuned down to 1/1000 for being more reliable although on certain cases it does reach the 1/2000. Soon i will post a review of the XD-7 too - Stay tuned) . The camera is well sealed against dust too.
The CG-5 is of similar size as the XD-7
My sample seems to be in good condition. There are the usual scratches for a camera of this vintage but nothing too much. The mirror is a quick returned shockless mirror that uses air damper as it goes up but is not that well damped as it goes down. This results in an odd noise, something that i have never heard before but it does sound very reassuring and reliable. The sound is very different from my Minolta XD-7 which uses the same shutter, so i assume that it is the mirror mechanism that makes this noise. According to Popular Photography, the mirror box is very well designed and it incorporates air-dampers for both the raise and fall of the mirror although in my case (setting the camera to "B") the mirror is quiet when it comes up but is definately more noisy when it goes down. The truth is that the camera handles the mirror shock quite effectively and with minimal vibrations. In photography forums, people say that the CG-5 is as quiet as the Pentax-ME Super if not more - a big praise to read. The camera's viewfinder is nice, not as bright as others or not as big as - say Pentax ME-Super - but there isn't much to complain about. There is also the provision for a motor drive, called Power-Winder-S that makes the Chinon looks mean and very professional (sic !).
The camera comes with the good old aperture priority (called Auto) and full time manual. In aperture priority, the shutter speeds become completely stepless. Other features include things like exposure lock, double exposure level, depth preview, self timer etc... and there are some nice touches such as the comfortable plastic grip that is detachable and serves to hold two spare batteries in case the ones you use perish. If you notice on the picture, you will see three electronic couplings below the pentaprism and above the lens. There is also a led on the viewfinder saying "AF". Apparently, Chinon produced an AF zoom lens back in the early days of AF, that could be mounted on the camera and offer AF. That lens, an AF 35-70 f/3.5-4.5, was a monster lens with something that looks like goggles which was using infrared beams to focus. Not really anyone's cup of tea, that's why Chinon dropped its production quite quickly. Top and bottom plate are made from plastic with gives a very similar feeling to the Minolta X-700 but just like the Minolta, this is a reliable machine that has stood the test of time.
A big plus for the camera is the lens mount. It uses Pentax's K-mount with means that you can find Takumar optics of the highest quality and mount it on the Chinon, making the camera a very good and cheap alternative to the more expensive Pentaxes without (in my opinion) sacrificing on the quality of the camera. As it is, the camera comes usually with the Chinon 50 f/1.9 which is a good performer past f/5.6 but nothing to be excited about. Couple this camera with a Takumar 50 f/1.8 and you'll see what this combination is capable of.
Performance-wise, this camera delivered what was expected. The light-meter is as accurate as any centred-weighted meter can be and the aperture priority mode is reliable. Exactly what you would expect from a camera of this category really. The camera uses the cheap and easy to find LR-44 (or SR-44) batteries and is quite efficient, meaning that is cheap to maintain.
What i would like to see in this camera? Hmm... maybe aperture readings in the viewfinder like its older sibling (CE-5) and I bet that a metal top and bottom plate would have a significant positive impact on its feel-good factor. Also, the shutter dial is not as easy to turn as it is covered by the film advance level. Finally, the film advance level, although made from metal underneath, it is covered with a cheap plastic held in place by one tiny screw, it does look cheap although the metal level underneath is surely strong enough to sustain moderate-to-heavy use.
Conclusion.
The Chinon CG-5 camera falls into this category of cameras that the digital age has left them littering car boot sales and can be acquired for as little as £5 (if not less) - something that shows how under-rated these high-quality cameras are. Their story brings in mind a lot of similarities with Fujicas but for me the Chinons are a step up. More refined, more up to date with their contemporary offers from the big five and at times (like in the case of the CE-5) better equipped. Popular photography's strip down lab test to the Chinon CE-4 (which is virtually the same camera as the CG-5 that i am reviewing here) spoke about a camera that is a pleasure to use - and indeed it is.
I would seriously recommend this camera for photographers on a budget that prefer to invest their money on a combination of good lenses and a good alternative camera body. It is well made, it is reliable, it has every feature you need and it costs less. Get this Chinon and pay the difference in getting a good quality Pentax lens. Pretty much the same approach as many photographers do by buying a Yashica with the Zeiss lenses from Contax, if you see what i mean.
Highly Recommented.

Lasting impressions
Another camera that I have sold since. I didn't really use it as much as it deserved it and since I received a email saying how much they would like to have it, i decided to sell it for the amount i bought it. Nice camera, really keep your eyes open if you come across one of these!

Comments

  1. Good review. I bought one recently for a few quid and shot a roll of Portra 400. Results are fine with good metering and, although the shutter is louder than I hoped it would be, there seems little or no vibration. As you pointed out, the mirror is well damped on the way up but then drops back down to the stops with a bit of a thwack, hence the noise. I thought of placing some 1mm light seal felt on the stops to soften the impact but this would probably affect focusing accuracy. I don't have the detachable grip on mine and found it's quite easy to knock the self timer switch across by accident. A solid 35mm SLR for not much money. Thanks for the review.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...