Back in my teen years, I didn't know much about Chinon. The only
model I knew was the CP-9AF and my limited knowledge on it was that it
was a cheap alternative AF camera to the more prestigious
Nikon/Canon/Minolta's. I never really bothered learning about Chinons,
what was the point anyway - Nikon and Canons were producing much better
cameras, right? Wrong. What i found out after joining photography forums
is that almost all Chinons are fantastic cameras, much better than your
average SLR's, with certain models competing directly with offers from
the big fives (Nikon/Canon/Minolta/Olympus/ Pentax) but never really achieved any sort of collectible status. One of these cameras is the Chinon CG-5.
This camera was produced in 1983 and it was set to compete with
cameras such as the Minolta X-700, the Canon AE-1 Programme, Pentax
ME-Super and P30 and maybe (or maybe not) the Nikons (FE/FE2). In the
heart of the CG-5 we find the Seiko MFC shutter which is found in
cameras like the Minolta XD-7 or the Pentax ME-super, cameras that have
reached a cult status for their reliability and performance. In Minolta
terms, i see this camera as a crossover between the XD-7 and the X-700, a
high praise indeed, carrying the XD-7's electronic and very reliable
shutter in a body made out of aluminium and plastic (like the X-700).
According to Popular Photography, the CG-5 was the scale down
version of their professional CE-5, differing only in the fact that the
CG-5 does not display the aperture in the viewfinder and the CE-5 having
a top speed of 1/2000 (the CG-5 has 1/1000). Both cameras use the same
shutter and it seems that in the case of the CG-5, the Japanese went for
the German approach to shutters (Leica) to tune down the shutter in
order to make it more reliable (The seiko MFC on the Minolta XD-7 is
tuned down to 1/1000 for being more reliable although on certain cases
it does reach the 1/2000. Soon i will post a review of the XD-7 too -
Stay tuned) . The camera is well sealed against dust too.
![]() |
| The CG-5 is of similar size as the XD-7 |
The camera comes with the good old aperture priority
(called Auto) and full time manual. In aperture priority, the shutter
speeds become completely stepless. Other features include things like
exposure lock, double exposure level, depth preview, self timer etc...
and there are some nice touches such as the comfortable plastic grip
that is detachable and serves to hold two spare batteries in case the
ones you use perish. If you notice on the picture, you will see three
electronic couplings below the pentaprism and above the lens. There is
also a led on the viewfinder saying "AF". Apparently, Chinon produced an
AF zoom lens back in the early days of AF, that could be mounted on the
camera and offer AF. That lens, an AF 35-70 f/3.5-4.5, was a monster
lens with something that looks like goggles which was using infrared
beams to focus. Not really anyone's cup of tea, that's why Chinon
dropped its production quite quickly. Top and bottom plate are made from
plastic with gives a very similar feeling to the Minolta X-700 but just
like the Minolta, this is a reliable machine that has stood the test of
time.
A big plus for the camera is the lens mount. It uses
Pentax's K-mount with means that you can find Takumar optics of the
highest quality and mount it on the Chinon, making the camera a very
good and cheap alternative to the more expensive Pentaxes without (in my
opinion) sacrificing on the quality of the camera. As it is, the camera
comes usually with the Chinon 50 f/1.9 which is a good performer past
f/5.6 but nothing to be excited about. Couple this camera with a Takumar
50 f/1.8 and you'll see what this combination is capable of.
Performance-wise, this camera delivered what was
expected. The light-meter is as accurate as any centred-weighted meter
can be and the aperture priority mode is reliable. Exactly what you
would expect from a camera of this category really. The camera uses the
cheap and easy to find LR-44 (or SR-44) batteries and is quite
efficient, meaning that is cheap to maintain.
What i would like to see in this camera? Hmm... maybe aperture
readings in the viewfinder like its older sibling (CE-5) and I bet that a
metal top and bottom plate would have a significant positive impact on
its feel-good factor. Also, the shutter dial is not as easy to turn as it is covered by the film advance level. Finally, the film advance level, although made
from metal underneath, it is covered with a cheap plastic held in place
by one tiny screw, it does look cheap although the metal level
underneath is surely strong enough to sustain moderate-to-heavy use.
Conclusion.
The
Chinon CG-5 camera falls into this category of cameras that the digital
age has left them littering car boot sales and can be acquired for as
little as £5 (if not less) - something that shows how under-rated these
high-quality cameras are. Their story brings in mind a lot of
similarities with Fujicas but for me the Chinons are a step up. More
refined, more up to date with their contemporary offers from the big
five and at times (like in the case of the CE-5) better equipped.
Popular photography's strip down lab test to the Chinon CE-4 (which
is virtually the same camera as the CG-5 that i am reviewing here) spoke
about a camera that is a pleasure to use - and indeed it is.
I would seriously recommend this camera for
photographers on a budget that prefer to invest their money on a
combination of good lenses and a good alternative camera body. It is
well made, it is reliable, it has every feature you need and it costs
less. Get this Chinon and pay the difference in getting a good quality
Pentax lens. Pretty much the same approach as many photographers do by
buying a Yashica with the Zeiss lenses from Contax, if you see what i
mean.
Highly Recommented.
Lasting impressions
Lasting impressions
Another camera that I have sold
since. I didn't really use it as much as it deserved it and since I
received a email saying how much they would like to have it, i decided
to sell it for the amount i bought it. Nice camera, really keep your
eyes open if you come across one of these!


Good review. I bought one recently for a few quid and shot a roll of Portra 400. Results are fine with good metering and, although the shutter is louder than I hoped it would be, there seems little or no vibration. As you pointed out, the mirror is well damped on the way up but then drops back down to the stops with a bit of a thwack, hence the noise. I thought of placing some 1mm light seal felt on the stops to soften the impact but this would probably affect focusing accuracy. I don't have the detachable grip on mine and found it's quite easy to knock the self timer switch across by accident. A solid 35mm SLR for not much money. Thanks for the review.
ReplyDelete