Skip to main content

Zenit 12XP

It is big. It is heavy as a brick and handles like one. It is extremely noisy and the viewfinder is... let's say... dark. Why should I ever bother with this camera?
Let's take the story from the beginning.
When my brother in law moved into his new house, he found this camera in his basement. Obviously the previous owner didn't consider taking it with him. Then my mother in law, who knows that I collect cameras saved it from a certain disposal. That summer i got married so I always considered it a kind of wedding present. The camera came with the standard Helios 44-M4, a biotar copy, which appears to be single coated (I might be wrong). Obviously the Helios is a pretty decent lens, provides nice, old fashioned pictures with low contrast but try to avoid the sunshine because it really strangles to cope with high contrast. It appeared to be working ok so i run a film while on vacations and one when I returned to Edinburgh. From those two films i got the following pictures.




























I consider those pictures a good enough reason for definitely keeping this camera. And actually for some metaphysical reason, I've got my favorite pictures taken with this camera. Is it fate? Zen maybe? I have no idea, what I know is that this camera is producing excellent pictures, it has never failed me so far, accepts a wide range of M42 lenses and quite frankly, i see no reason why I should go after a £90 Spotmatic while this camera produces top-notch pictures. I got a Super Takumar 50 f/1.4 and I am more than happy. And by the way, DO NOT put a later Super-Multicoated Takumar on it, the pin for the diaphragm will get stuck in the screw hole and you cannot remove it without damaging the lens. Be very careful.

Some boring technical details. Horizontally moving rubberized cloth curtains bla bla, totally mechanical shutter bla bla bla , speeds 1/30 - 1/500 plus B bla bla bla...

A couple of interesting things that you might not know. The whole body is made from metal and if I remember right it comes in three different parts. Other cameras have much more than that which makes the Zenit much more robust camera. And i can assure you that it is. Some will mention something about lack of quality control and poor quality. Well, the shutter is sooooo simple (it doesn't even have slow speeds) that actually there are not many things to break down. And if it does, i will just open it and give it a good wash with Ronsol. That should fix it.
Another thing. Do you see the small screw infront on the left of the camera? You unscrew it and below it there is another small screw that calibrates the lightmeter. I tried it, it works. Now it is accurate again.

Conclusion:
The Leica IIc, the Zeiss Ikoflex Ib, the Canon EOS 5 and the Zenit 12XP are the cameras that I will never sell, no matter what.
I think this says it all.

Lasting Impressions
I am keeping this Zenit for sentimental reasons mostly. Despite its indestructible iron cast body, It feels unrefined, noisy and the light meter is unreliable. Still i have managed to take some very good pictures with it so I keep it. It also carries the Helios 44M-4 which is a excellent lens to use. These are the reasons why i am keeping them - if you cannot relate to any of those, a Fujica or Chinon will be a better option for you.

Comments

  1. great camera, and great photos! I often use my Zenit 122 or an old and solid Zenit E!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just got the Zenit 12xp and I already had the 44-2 that I use on my digital camera. I wanted to ask, Is there a way to put the metering to sleep if not in use? or I have to remove the batteries every time? thx in advance

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nikon F801s

The venerable Nikon F801s  This is a review of the Nikon F801s and it's progenitor, the F801. I've been using the F801s for a few months now and I own a plain F801 since 2017. As it is usually the case, it was an impulsive buy, it was for £0.99 with no bids online and I decided that I wanted to compare it with the old trusty F801. * Background information and history. Nikon joined the AF race quite early on in 1986 - Minolta's surprising announcement of the Dynax 7000/9000 the year before forced Nikon to release a modified version of the F301 with an AF module - the F501AF. Canon joined a year later with the first EOS camera (EOS 650) featuring a new lens mount with no backwards compatibility. Nikon's F501 used a very basic AF module with 96 CCDs  - this was eventually replaced by the "legendary" (the emphasis is mine) AM200 module (an array of 20 by 10 CCDs) which found its way in all AF Nikons - from F401 to the F4 and even the third generation ...

Pentax MZ-50

Cute... This was an impulsive buy - found it for £5 and thought i could have it. It came with 2 CR-2 batteries and initial testing at the shop showed that it worked well. Anyway, the batteries alone cost more than £5. I am not sure how did Pentax experienced the 1990's. Pentax was big in the swinging and dancing 60's with the Spotmatic, did very well in the 70s with the MX and it was the LX that dominated Pentax's pro-line in the 80s. But in the 90s Pentax did not come up with any pro camera and did not introduce any exotic lenses either. The different iterations of the Z-1 were good cameras but in the same league such as the Nikon F90 or Canon EOS5. If you scroll down my blog you will find a review of the Z1 - a very good camera which I sold due to the complicated user interface.  I have to say that the photographic press was pleasantly surprised by the Z-20. I don't see a lot of them coming up online and some of the reviews I read describe it as functiona...

Olympus 35DC

Pretty little thing This is a review of the Olympus 35 DC rangefinder. After i shot a film with it, i realized that it needed a CLA, so i will come back to it in the future and add a long lasting impressions section to this post. You know when you are going to have a good day - you walk down the street to go to your local car boot sale and you find a one pound coin and then you go to the sale and you find a nice Olympus 35 DC for £2. The previous owner stated that the camera belonged to his father, used it a few years ago before switching to digital and all pictures came out fine. So i thought.... yea why not, lets not haggle on this one. There were plenty of 35mm fixed lens rangefinder from Olympus during the 60's - too many to remember - all sold with beautiful Zuiko lenses. The Olympus 35xx series peaked with the 35SP during the late 60's. The 35SP was succeeded by the 35RD - Olympus dropped the spot metering and the 7 elements lens was scaled down to...